LIVE: NY - October 20th, 2026 🟢WIN: +45 Points💰

👉CLICK HERE: TO SEE THE ENTIRE LIVE LIBRARY👈

NY Session Recap — Profitable Day, but the Bigger Lesson Was Execution ⚙️📈

Finished today’s New York session green, but the most valuable takeaway had less to do with the +$450 realized profit and more to do with what happened between identifying the opportunity and actually getting into the trade.

I initially came into the sequence looking at the bearish side. The higher-timeframe trends supported it, but once I worked through the actual structure and reward caps, there wasn’t a legal bearish trade to take. So instead of forcing the original bias, I parked it and started working through the bullish side.

The bullish setup was against both the 4H and 1H trends, so this was a C-quality setup, not something I was going to pretend was an A+ just because it eventually worked.

The important numbers were:

Bullish 5m 2nd-stdev RewardCap: 124.75 pts
TMT 1:1: approximately 66–70 pts
TMT Range: 202.25 pts
Range was outside the RewardCap, so it was off the table.
The TMT 1:1 was the legal path, which meant Forced-C risk.

Where things got interesting was the execution.

I was a little slow getting the sizing workflow completed and getting the Junior MNQ Sizing Bot table set up. While I was doing that, the market was moving.

By the time I was ready to execute, my entry wasn't the entry I originally wanted.

That delay changed more than just my entry price.

It changed the stop geometry, which changed my available size, which changed how much of the move I could realistically capture.

What I actually did

My live sizing ended up at:

1 MNQ per TPT account × 5 accounts

I ultimately took approximately +45 points, which worked out to:

+$90/account

+$450 total

So yes — green day. ✅

But simply writing "+$450" in the journal would miss the biggest lesson from the session.

What I believe clean execution looked like

After the session, I reconstructed the trade from the entry I originally intended to get.

Had I been ready and executed when the setup was there, my stop would have been approximately 113.5 points away, and I would have been able to size approximately:

2 MNQ per account

From that entry, the move I was looking to capture was approximately 70 points.

My reconstructed perfect-execution result was therefore roughly:

2 MNQ/account

~70 points

≈ $283/account

≈ $1,415 across the five accounts

For clarity, I'm not counting that as money made.

The official result is still +$450.

The ~$1,415 number is simply my perfect-execution benchmark—a way of measuring how much the operational delay potentially affected the trade.

That's an important distinction for me.

I don't want to journal hypothetical money as though I actually earned it, but I do want to measure the cost of execution mistakes.

The real lesson from today

The mistake wasn't:

"I should have held longer."

And it wasn't:

"I should have taken more risk."

The issue happened before the trade was even entered.

The sequence became:

Setup appears → sizing workflow → table setup → order preparation → delayed entry.

And that delay affected the entire trade:

Entry → Stop Distance → Position Size → Available Reward → Final P/L

That's the part I'm working on.

I don't want to remove the risk-management process or rush the sizing. The sizing rules are there for a reason.

What I need to improve is having everything that can be prepared beforehand already prepared:

Book verified. Accounts grouped. Platform ready. Sizing workflow ready.

Then, when the actual setup appears, I'm only feeding in the variables that changed instead of doing administrative work while the entry is getting away from me.

Final numbers

1 trade

1 win

+45 points actual

+$90/account

+$450 realized

11% Eval risk used

No second trade

Perfect-execution benchmark:

~113.5 pt stop | 2 MNQ/account | ~70 pt capture | ≈$283/account | ≈$1,415 total

Green day, but today's biggest win was identifying a very specific bottleneck in my execution process.

The setup can be right and the risk management can be right, but if the execution infrastructure isn't ready when the opportunity arrives, you're still leaving efficiency on the table.

That's what I'm tightening up next.

0 comments

LIVE: NY - October 20th, 2026 🟢WIN: +45 Points💰